Comments on: Nuclear Energy in Indonesia http://extravehicularactivity.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/nuclear-energy-in-indonesia/ you just have to get out... Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:49:12 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: nggieng http://extravehicularactivity.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/nuclear-energy-in-indonesia/#comment-8 nggieng Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:56:21 +0000 http://extravehicularactivity.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/nuclear-energy-in-indonesia/#comment-8 hell yeah, from a pessimistic perpsective, never build ur own gallows pole .. pessimistic because we cannot manage our own muddy problems, pessimistic because we cannot manage our pollution problem, pessimistic because we cannot manage our natural resources .. pessimistic because of one simple questions? are we ready for protecting our nature? i once went to a place on south sea of java, there is a plan to build PLTU (steam reactor), good .. but by compromising what? They plan to cut hills around the area, ironically, the hills were the natural fortress against the ocean wave (tsunami), so if they cut the hills off, will they ready for another risks? do they think about that? i would be good pessimistic supporter for my own country, because of one silly reason, if we want to make a good "take off/lepas landas", we have to think about good airport, not just 'appear to be good', same as with nuclear reactor, we 'might' need it, economically, energetically, or what ever urgency reason, but are we really ready for the risks. That is belong to the sense of 'responsibility', per se, and we have to pondering a lot about that. hell yeah, from a pessimistic perpsective, never build ur own gallows pole .. pessimistic because we cannot manage our own muddy problems, pessimistic because we cannot manage our pollution problem, pessimistic because we cannot manage our natural resources ..

pessimistic because of one simple questions? are we ready for protecting our nature? i once went to a place on south sea of java, there is a plan to build PLTU (steam reactor), good .. but by compromising what? They plan to cut hills around the area, ironically, the hills were the natural fortress against the ocean wave (tsunami), so if they cut the hills off, will they ready for another risks? do they think about that?

i would be good pessimistic supporter for my own country, because of one silly reason, if we want to make a good “take off/lepas landas”, we have to think about good airport, not just ‘appear to be good’, same as with nuclear reactor, we ‘might’ need it, economically, energetically, or what ever urgency reason, but are we really ready for the risks. That is belong to the sense of ‘responsibility’, per se, and we have to pondering a lot about that.

]]>